![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
https://bit.ly/3sb2Oic https://bit.ly/353gq6n https://bit.ly/3JPsZkw https://bit.ly/33OQ2ww https://bit.ly/3BY2837 https://bit.ly/3JBF10A https://bit.ly/3HfPKMy https://bit.ly/3LUOSAv https://bit.ly/3LUBZqj https://bit.ly/33I62jE https://bit.ly/35nmTcc https://bit.ly/3IhQ4Md
and then lovingly ravishing her. So: No male domination = No sex = No love. That's my formula. All the jokes I've made about Lorena Bobbitt revolved around my desire to see her thrown into some dank hellhole of a prison, and subjected to a little old-fashioned "eye for an eye" justice. I would have no hesitation at all about kneeing or kicking a man in the groin, if he were some stranger assaulting me. But I would never want to kick a man I loved in the groin, of course. And to be certain that would never happen, I would like him to assure me that if I ever did that, he would beat the crap out of me. Really, all that's needed to ensure my good behavior, for the most part, is that the man does his job of being sufficiently overpowering, dominating, and intimidating. The only reason I'd ever be inclined to slap my man is if he were not being dominant enough. In my experience that can really bring out a man's dominant side; and if it doesn't do that, it probably means he doesn't have one. So, it's more of a test and a challenge than anything else.
I am deeply familiar with the walk-away. Leaving the man in bafflement is yet another ritualistic sort of posture. My notion is that honorable people give reasons for what they do.
A man has no right to know that I'm sexually submissive, unless he himself is sexually dominant, and we're heading into an intimate relationship. It's not something that I routinely announce to men that I date; it's something that I expect them to figure out if they're dominant. So, it's a test. If they're not dominant -- or if they have dominant inclinations but they're afraid to follow them -- then they fail the test. I want a man who is not only physically and sexually dominant, but proud and confident in his dominance. If he needs my engraved invitation in order to start dominating me, then he's not my kind of guy.
We all have our take it or leave it stuff. This site is good because it helps us clarify our own terms. Some issues bring things sharply into focus.
Right. For me the man's physical strength and dominance is not something that I'm willing to compromise on. But it often requires that I spell that out fully, because people seem to have different ideas about what male dominance involves. I don't mind spelling it out here; but I'm
